{"id":16306,"date":"2020-07-11T22:34:21","date_gmt":"2020-07-12T02:34:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/?p=16306"},"modified":"2021-12-18T04:41:21","modified_gmt":"2021-12-18T09:41:21","slug":"an-outline-for-a-discussion-on-the-subject-of-how-and-from-where-does-the-spirit-soul-fall-down-to-the-material-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/an-outline-for-a-discussion-on-the-subject-of-how-and-from-where-does-the-spirit-soul-fall-down-to-the-material-world\/","title":{"rendered":"An Outline for a Discussion on the Subject of &#8220;How and from Where Does the Spirit Soul Fall Down to the  Material\u00a0 World?&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>#Jiva tattva<\/p>\n<p>#Jivatattva<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>An Outline for a Discussion on the Subject of &#8220;How and from Where Does the Spirit Soul Fall Down to the<\/p>\n<p>Material\u00a0 World?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>by\u00a0 Suhotra\u00a0 Swami<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n[Note: In brackets like these, references to the &#8220;Notes and Quotes&#8221; outline will be made]\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Prosand\u00a0 Cons\u00a0 of\u00a0 such\u00a0 a\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Pro: devotees always inquire about this question; they are often quite misinformed (don&#8217;t know what Srila Prabhupada says about it); so, though this speaker doesn&#8217;t claim to have all the final answers that will settle all doubts, he has assembled a lot of bonafide information, and this will be helpful to better understand the subject matter.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Con: Deductive &#8220;speculation&#8221; on this subject seems unavoidable, even when armed with full information, so errors may creep in; Srila Prabhupada said it&#8217;s more or<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>less\u00a0 a\u00a0 waste\u00a0 of\u00a0 time\u00a0 (vide\u00a0 letter\u00a0 to\u00a0 Upendra,\u00a0 27\u00a0 Oct.\u00a0 1969).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Some theories addressing the question of how and from where did we fall down. Overriding consideration: we must not look to put the blame for our falldown on Krishna.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We fell\u00a0 from\u00a0 the\u00a0 brahmajyoti\u00a0 (aruhya\u00a0 ..)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>This theory was not favored by Srila Prabhupada, because the brahmajyoti is impersonal; accepting this theory implies our original position is impersonal. But he did<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>not\u00a0 completely\u00a0 reject\u00a0 it,\u00a0 either.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>Examples:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Theconversation\u00a0 transcript\u00a0 circulated\u00a0 out<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a0 L.A.\u00a0 around\u00a0 8\u00a0 years\u00a0 ago.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>B. 3.25.29,\u00a0 purport,\u00a0 last\u00a0 paragraph.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Letter to\u00a0 Harer\u00a0 Nama,\u00a0 21\u00a0 \u00a0 1968\u00a0 [V.A.]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Isopanisad?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We fell from the santa-rasa (not being very engaged there, we got bored).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>This explanation also is not very satisfactory, as evinced from a letter to Jagadish, 27 Feb. 1970 [V.C.]<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Giving up all desires not connected with Krishna is the business of one who is in the santa-rasa. Only<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>devoteeof\u00a0 Krishna\u00a0 can\u00a0 be\u00a0 situated\u00a0 on\u00a0 that\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>He is thus called a santa-rasa-bhakta.&#8221; (C.C. Madhya 19.214) C. We fell directly from a full-blown rasa in the<\/p>\n<p>spiritual\u00a0 world\u00a0 (our\u00a0 constitutional\u00a0 position).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>From Srila Prabhupada&#8217;s books and letters, we get two views.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>The unsupportive\u00a0 view\u00a0 is\u00a0 found\u00a0 in\u00a0 two\u00a0 purports:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>B. 3.16.12,\u00a0 purport.<\/li>\n<li>B. 3.25.29\u00a0 (last\u00a0 paragraph).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>The supportive\u00a0 view:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Letter to\u00a0 Jagadisha,\u00a0 27\u00a0 \u00a0 1970\u00a0 (cited<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>above).<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Letter to\u00a0 Jagadisha\u00a0 25\u00a0 April\u00a0 1970\u00a0 [V.E]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Why is\u00a0 Srila\u00a0 Prabhupada\u00a0 seemingly\u00a0 equivocal?\n<ol>\n<li>Hedoesn&#8217;t\u00a0 know\u00a0 the\u00a0 answer\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>It&#8217;s not important, so he&#8217;s answering without much consideration for apparent contradictions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>There are a number of factors involved, and at different times Srila Prabhupada has addressed different factors.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>I take (C) as the answer, and have developed a synthetic approach to the problem.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>In this approach, we won&#8217;t be attempting to figure out how the living entity fell down to the material world from gopi-bhava. That assumption, just like the assumption that we must have fallen from the brahmajyoti,<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>overlooks\u00a0 much\u00a0 evidence\u00a0 Srila\u00a0 Prabhupada\u00a0 has\u00a0 given\u00a0 us.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>At least one can listen to this presentation for an education in what Srila Prabhupada says on this subject. One may still reserve one&#8217;s own opinion on the synthetic framework itself.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>As we go through the presentation, we can discuss. We have up to three days.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li>The synthetic reasoning of the evidence pivots on the allowance of the choice of the living entity between maya and Krishna. Without allowing for choice, we are<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>only left with an appeal to the inconceivable &#8211; which is what the mayavadis do also. There&#8217;s no choice between maya and Krishna in Goloka that we know of or can conceive of. Goloka is not a marginal realm, it&#8217;s the absolute highest realm of God consciousness. In my mind there&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>philosophical difficulty with assuming that we &#8220;began&#8221; in our eternal rasa and then fell down (though, in my synthetic approach I don&#8217;t rule this out). The problem is, love of Krishna is itself the result of a choice. It is voluntary. So to say we fell down from pure love of Krishna because of some accident seems to indicate we weren&#8217;t aware of such a possibility of falldown before we fell (the &#8220;purify our love even more&#8221; theory. And it also seems to aim the blame at Krishna, which we&#8217;re not going to do here, because Srila Prabhupada always takes the standpoint that it&#8217;s our fault. For those who say<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m begging the question by preserving choice by restricting the examination to the marginal region where falldown is clearly possible, I ask &#8211; from where did the opportunity<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>and choice to fall down arise if we all begin automatically on the highest platform? Where is the choice to love Krishna if we all begin automatically in a loving rasa<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>with Him? Anyway, this seminar is not attempting to explain how we moved from a fully-devloped rasa with Krishna to<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>the marginal position, but it will discuss how the living entity fell from the spiritual world to the material world as Srila Prabhupada has given evidence.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Evidence to show that the junction of the fall is from Mahavishnu:\n<ol start=\"1969\">\n<li>Letterto\u00a0 Upendra,\u00a0 27\u00a0 October\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>Brahma-samhita 5.10, purport [IV.C]. Living entities are tathasta (marginal), and Maha-Vishnu is situated on the dividing line. Please keep in mind that Goddess Ramaa-devi and Lord Maha-Vishnu are non-different from Radha-Krishna &#8211; this is how They appear from the marginal point of view.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>References to vishnu&#8217;s glancing over Maya &#8211; have them listed on board already.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Bhedha-drsya as exact dividing line between spiritual and material world (3.32.12-15). Dialectical Spiritualism quote [III.A]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Brahman-Pradhan (S.B. 3.26.10, purport; B.S. 5.8, purport [IV.B]; letter to Bhagavandas, 2. March 1970 [V.D]).<\/li>\n<li>Transcendental (devotional) santa-rasa and nondevotional (mundane) neutrality.\n<ol>\n<li>C. Madhya\u00a0 24.163-164:\u00a0 13\u00a0 types\u00a0 of\u00a0 santa-<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>bhaktas.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>Paramatma-sayuja: C.\u00a0 Madhya\u00a0 6.269.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Devotional and nondevotional anandamaya; S.B. 6.15.12-15 for Panchasikha-acarya (Madhva philosophy ref.); B.S. 5.22 [IV.H]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The question\u00a0 of\u00a0 choice:\u00a0 as\u00a0 offered\u00a0 to\u00a0 us\u00a0 by\u00a0 Maha-Vishnu.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Soul never\u00a0 out\u00a0 of\u00a0 consciousness:\u00a0 B.3.7.6,\u00a0 purport.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Letter to\u00a0 Jagadisha,\u00a0 25\u00a0 April\u00a0 1970,\u00a0 [V.E.]<\/li>\n<li>B. 5.6,\u00a0 purport\u00a0 [IV.A].<\/li>\n<li>Maha-Vishnu\/Shankarshan\/Balaram as\u00a0 adi-guru.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Glance at maya, then we saw: Dialectical Spiritualism, page 216 [III.B]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Choiceas\u00a0 offered\u00a0 by\u00a0 Garbhodakashayi\u00a0 Vishnu.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>(Put all this on the board:) Appearance of &#8220;golden sperms&#8221; (or eggs) within body of Maha-Vishnu: S.B. 3.26.51-<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>[I.N]; S.B. 2.10.13 [I.K]; B.S. 5.13 [IV.D]; Hiranyagarbha as prime projenitor: B.S. 5.15 [IV.E]; Hiranyagarbha as pure consciousness: S.B. 3.26.21-24 [I.M]; living entities merged there in<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>self-enjoyment:\u00a0 B.S.\u00a0 5.22,\u00a0 purport\u00a0 [IV.H];\u00a0 worshippers<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>of Hiranyagarbha merge with Brahma and go with him to Maha-purusha: S.B. 3.32.8, 3.32.10.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>Choice of living entity in this state: B.S. 5.16, purport [IV.G] and B.S. 5.19, purport [IV.I]; Yoga-nidra is Rama-devi (B.S. 5.12 [IV.F]).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>VII. Third chance, with Paramatma in human form: S.B. 4.29.4, purport.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Notes\u00a0 and\u00a0 Quotes\u00a0 for\u00a0 &#8220;Falldown&#8221;\u00a0 Seminar<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>From Srimad\u00a0 Bhagavatam:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>bheda-drstya, from S.B. 3.32.12-15 (purport): &#8220;Here the word bhedy-drstya occurs because Brahma has a slight inclination to think that he is as independent as Rudra. Sometimes Brahma thinks that he is independent of the Supreme Lord, and the worshipper also thinks that Brahma<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>is independent. For this reason, after the destruction of the material world, when there is again creation by the interaction of the material modes of nature, Brahma<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>comes back. Although Brahma reaches the Supreme Personality of Godhead as the first purusa incarnation, Maha-Visnu,<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>who is full with transcendental qualities, he cannot stay in the spiritual world.&#8221;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>The &#8220;Brahma&#8221;\u00a0 question:\u00a0 32.9,\u00a0 purport.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li>Falldown due to choice; first accepts human body: S.B. 4.29.4., whole purport.<\/li>\n<li>B. 3.16.12,\u00a0 purport:\u00a0 Jaya\u00a0 and\u00a0 vijaya\u00a0 falldown<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>an\u00a0 accident;\u00a0 one\u00a0 who\u00a0 has\u00a0 entered\u00a0 Vaikutna\u00a0 never\u00a0 falls\u00a0 down.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Worshippers of Hiranyagarbha go with Brahma to spiritual world: 3.32.8., purport.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>How living entity falls down: 3.25.29, purport (last paragraph).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Perhaps useful &#8211; soul never out of consciousness: S.B.3.7.6.<\/li>\n<li>Soul product\u00a0 of\u00a0 tatastha-sakti:\u00a0 B.\u00a0 3.7.9\u00a0 and<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>purport.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Creation (beginning with glance of Vishnu over maya): 3.5.23-51 and 3.6.1-10.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>B. 2.4.23, 28: Brahma created using limbs of Lord in sacrifice.<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Seminal symbol&#8221;\u00a0 verse:\u00a0 B.2.10.12.<\/li>\n<li>Pradhana: B.\u00a0 3.26.10,\u00a0 purport.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Hiranyagarbha as pure consciousness (vasudeva-sattva): S.B. 3.26.18-24.<\/li>\n<li>Hiranmaya as\u00a0 &#8220;golden\u00a0 egg&#8221;:\u00a0 B.\u00a0 3.26.53.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>Synonyms for bheda-drsya: bhinna drsah (S.B. 3.29.26), bheda-buddhi.<\/li>\n<li>More golden\u00a0 egg:\u00a0 B.\u00a0 3.26.51-53.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"6\">\n<li>B. 6.15.12-15: Panchashikacharya and liberation from the 5 koshas.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>FromSri\u00a0 Caitanya\u00a0 Caritamrta:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Shanta-rasa: C.C. Madhya 19, 183-184 (purport): santa as Paramatma realization.<\/li>\n<li>Same as\u00a0 A:\u00a0 Madhya\u00a0 218.<\/li>\n<li>Madhya 163-164\u00a0 describes\u00a0 13\u00a0 types\u00a0 of\u00a0 munis\u00a0 and<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>yogis\u00a0 as\u00a0 santa-bhaktas.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"6\">\n<li>Paramatma-sayuja: C.\u00a0 Madhya\u00a0 6.269.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>From Dialectical\u00a0 Spiritualism:<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Page 167: &#8220;Original sin means refusing to serve God and attempting instead to become God. Mayavadis, for<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>instance, are still attempting to become God, despite their knowledge and philosophy&#8230;The attempt to become God is<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0 original\u00a0 sin,\u00a0 the\u00a0 beginning\u00a0 of\u00a0 sinful\u00a0 life.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>216: &#8220;We are the subordinate living entities. Our perception is limited, and God&#8217;s perception is unlimited. It is admitted that everything exists due to God&#8217;s perception.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>FromSri\u00a0 Brahma\u00a0 Samhita:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>The choice (from B.S. 5.6, purport): &#8220;The sole potency of Krsna which is spiritual, functioning as Krsna&#8217;s own proper power, has manifested His pastimes of Goloka<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>or Gokula. By her grace individual souls who are constit-uents of the marginal potency can have admission into even those pastimes. The deluding energy who is of the nature of the perverted reflection of the spiritual (cit) potency, has got her location on the other side of the river Viraja, which surrounds the Brahma-dhama forming the boundary of Maha-Vaikuntha as the outer envelope of Goloka.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>8, purport: Shankarshan as Maha-vishnu glances at Maya. From His glance comes the halo of Shambhu, which enshrines the living entities as pradhana (the fundamental material principle, the &#8220;dim twilight reflection of the supreme eternal effulgence.&#8221; Maya is adhara, the accomodating principle.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>Maha Vishnu in neutral position (in Viraja) between spiritual and material worlds (B.S. 5.10, purport). And pradhana embodies &#8220;the substantive principle of all living entities.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>Appearance of haimany andani (&#8220;golden sperms) within the body of Maha-Vishnu: B.S. 5.13.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>S. 5.15: Hiranyagarbha is prime projenitor (different from 4-faced Brahma) from whom Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu (Paramatma) within the universes appear.<\/li>\n<li>Yoga-nidra is\u00a0 Rama-devi:\u00a0 S.\u00a0 5.12.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>Second fall-down due to false ego (B.S. 5.16, purport): &#8220;Again when in the course of the progressive evolution of the mundane creation each universe is manifested, then in the principle of Shambhu, born of the space between the two eyebrows of Vishnu, there appears the manifestation of the personality of Rudra; yet under all circumstances Shambhu fully enshrines the mundane egoistic principle. The innumerable jivas as spiritual<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>particles emanating from the oversoul in the form of pencils of rays of effulgence, have no relation with the mundane world when they come to know themselves to be the eternal servants of the Supreme Lord. They are then incorporated into the realm of Vaikuntha. But when they desire to lord it over Maya, forgetting their real identity, the egoistic principle Shambhu entering into their entities makes them identify themselves as separated enjoyers of mundane entities. Hence Shambhu is the primary principle of the egoistic mundane universe and of perverted egotism in jivas that identitifies itself with their limited material bodies.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>All living entities as first merged within Hiranyagarbha (B.S. 5.22, purport): &#8220;The four-faced Brahma, the image of self-enjoyment, derives his origin from the prototype Brahma or Hiranyagarbha, the mundane seminal principle, who regards the aggregate of all mundane entities as His own proper body.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li>Quote from B.S. 5.19, purport: &#8220;When Krishna desires to manifest something in the mundane ignorance-wrapt af-fairs, He does this by the conjunction of His spiritual<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>potency with His inactive nonspiritual potency. This is known as Yogamaya. It carries a twofold notion, namely, transcendental notion and mundane inert notion. Krishna Himself, His subjective portions and those jivas who are His unalloyed separated particles, realize the transcend-ental notion in that conjuction, while conditioned souls feel the mundane inert notion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>From Srila\u00a0 Prabhupada&#8217;s\u00a0 letters:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To Harer Nama, 21 Dec. 1968: &#8220;Your second question about falling down from the brahmjyoti is answered that<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>it is not that one must fall down, but that they generally fall down.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To Upendra, 27 October 1969: &#8220;The conditioned souls are always within the Maha Vishnu Form, whereas the liberated souls in Vaikuntha, they are engaged in the service of the Lord. Constitutionally every living entity, even if he is in the Vaikuntha Loka, has chance of falling down. Therefore the living entity is called marginal energy. But when the falldown has taken place for the conditioned soul is very difficult to ascertain&#8230;But for arguments sake, a living entity being marginal energy,<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>he cant be eternally conditioned. The Time is so unlimited that the conditioned souls appear to be eternally so, but from the philosophical view he cannot be eternally conditioned.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To Jagadisha, 27 Feb. 1970: &#8220;Regarding your question concerning the spirit souls falling into Maya&#8217;s influence, it is not that those who have developed a passive relationship with Krishna are more likely to fall into nescient activities. Usually anyone who has developed<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>his relationship with Krishna does not fall down in any circumstance, but because the independence is always there, the soul may fall down from any position or any relationship by misusing his independence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To Bhagavandas, 2 March 1970: &#8220;The pradhan is the ingredient part of material energy.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To Jagadisha, 25 April 1970: &#8220;Regarding your questions about how and from where did the conditioned souls fall, your first question if someone has a relationship with Lord Krishna on Krsna-loka, does he ever fall down? The souls are endowed with minute independence as part of their nature and this minute independence may be utilized rightly or wrongly at any time, so there is always the chance of falling down by misuse of one&#8217;s independence. But those who are firmly fixed up in devotional service to Krishna are making proper use of their independence and so they do not fall down.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Regarding your second question, have the conditioned souls ever seen Krishna? Were they with the Lord before being conditioned by the desire to lord it over material nature? Yes, the conditioned souls are parts and parcels of the Lord and thus they were with Krishna before being conditioned. Just as the child must have seen his father because the father places the child in the womb of the mother, similarly each soul has seen Krishna or the Supreme Father. But at that time the conditioned souls are resting in the condition called susupti which is exactly deep sleep without dream, or anethetized state, therefore they do<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>not remember being with Krishna when they wake up in the material world and become engaged in material affairs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Sankarshanas\u00a0 adi-guru.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Opening\u00a0 Arguments\u00a0 for\u00a0 2nd\u00a0 Day\u00a0 of\u00a0 Seminar<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Introduction<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>mac-citta mad\u00a0 gata\u00a0 ..tesam\u00a0 evanukampartham&#8230;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>By the grace of the Vaishnavas Ikve made progress in understanding the problem (what was the reasoning behind questions).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We will\u00a0 attempt\u00a0 to\u00a0 answer\u00a0 yesterday&#8217;s\u00a0 questions<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>by reviewing the basics in a different way, and then go to some fundamental considerations that are at the bottom of the whole controversy.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>But I\u00a0 don&#8217;t\u00a0 want\u00a0 to\u00a0 get\u00a0 bogged\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Therefore<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>will be less humble today. I noticed we are reaching a point where the difference is not so much in what we are seeing, but how we&#8217;re seeing it &#8211; this relative differentiation has no end.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Arguments for\u00a0 ayi\u00a0 nanda-tanuja\u00a0 ..<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We cannot go for a higher opinion than Lord Chaitanya.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Is this just Lord Chaitanya&#8217;s ecstatic humility as a perfect servant (Srimati Radharani)?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Yes &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not an instruction for us. S.B. 4.29.69.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2.Maybe we thought we were brahman only; maybe by all our endeavors of research, speculation, meditation, religiousity or whatever that is all we can realize. But now He has come to tell us &#8211; you are a fallen servant of Krishna. This is the ultimate reality.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Any objection?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Arguments for\u00a0 visnu\u00a0 ..<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>He&#8217;s always marginal (which means servant), yet again he&#8217;s the &#8220;bottom end&#8221; of visnu-sakti (or swarupa-sakti). That means his proper position is to serve the visnu sakti.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>He doesn not &#8220;become&#8221; liberated or &#8220;become&#8221; conditioned (his essential nature doesn&#8217;t change &#8211; letters). He simply serves one or the other potency.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Within Maha Vishnu, we have no service except to make that choice, which potency to serve. Therefore, I especially have pointed to that sitation as tatastha.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Arguementsfor\u00a0 qualities\u00a0 of\u00a0 Lord\u00a0 and\u00a0 Servant.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The living entity is by his nature fully dependent upon the superior qualities of the Lord. Therefore he<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>is naturally attracted by those qualities. Furthermore, the Lord is attracted by the dependence of the living entity. But as the Lord does not need the living entitiy, as the living entity needs the Lord, the Lord reserves<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>the right to remain aloof should the living entity make an inordinate demand of the Lord.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>What is that inordinate demand? To be the direct controller. (Original sin quote, Dialectical Spiritualism).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Then why are we made in that way? Is our slight independence like a the tonsils, a vestigal quality that can only become inflamed, and we therefore must remove it? Actually, that slight independence is our &#8220;jewel<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>quality&#8221; when it is surrendered to Krishna. Hrd Goswami&#8217;s class &#8211; guhyad-guhyataram (do your duty for me), then sarva-guhyatamam &#8211; manmana bhava mad bhakto&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>That propels the soul to loving relationships even beyond those enjoyed by Narada or even Laxmi. That is proper use of tatastha quality &#8211; voluntary surrender. By this one can purchase Krishna.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>So it\u00a0 is\u00a0 not\u00a0 that\u00a0 we\u00a0 are\u00a0 second-class\u00a0 citizens<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a0 the\u00a0 spiritual\u00a0 world.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Tatashta\u00a0 is\u00a0 a\u00a0 great\u00a0 advantage<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>in\u00a0 winning\u00a0 Krishna&#8217;s\u00a0 love.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>BrahmanPradhan\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Susupti is brahman realization &#8211; all physical, mental, intellectual and even egoistic conceptions are suspended.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>But Lord and His energy want sleeping soul to wake up. Adi guru (Vishnu, Sesha): Atmaramas ca munayo&#8230;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Those those who are only sleeping (atmaramas who are simply enjoying the self) will awaken to glories of the Lord, and be attracted to serve.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Those who are pretending to sleep (iswara sayuja, brahma sayuja) will resist. They will fall down &#8211; maya shakti will capture them.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>VII. Arguments for soul&#8217;s do not jump into maya: healthy tissue, disease tissue.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>VIII.\u00a0 Arguments\u00a0 for\u00a0 basis\u00a0 of\u00a0 Lord&#8217;s\u00a0 decision.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>So, either by vaisnava aparadha or by the Lord&#8217;s desire, one falls down. By the Lord&#8217;s desire one may even fall directly down (jaya Vijaya &#8211; special case; therefore nobody falls down from Vaikuntha).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Generally, falldown or crossing the threshold happens within Maha Vishnu (Brahman platform) But even that&#8217;s not impersonal, because Vishnu is deciding. Also, brahman is not our origin (jivera swarupa haya; Brahma Samhita; brahmano hi pratisthaham).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Why aren&#8217;t we swarupa-shakti? Swarupa shakti loves Krishna without independence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>P. said\u00a0 &#8220;wonderful\u00a0 love\u00a0 of\u00a0 Godhead&#8221;;\u00a0 very<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>advanced<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>devotees are &#8220;beacons to show the way&#8221; (how to surrender, how to use independence in Lord&#8217;s service). Mundane example of Gopal Ban. Using independence only to please &#8211; it&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>not slavery, it&#8217;s perfection (way of looking at the same thing).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>So real\u00a0 question\u00a0 is,\u00a0 &#8220;Why\u00a0 am\u00a0 I\u00a0 not\u00a0 perfect?&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The answer is, so that we can aspire to become perfect, by surrendering our jewel quality &#8211; that&#8217;s what captures Krishna&#8217;s attention. Even if we fall down, the Lord is<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>so anxious to have us back so that He can enjoy that jewel quality that He displays such wonderful lilas here in material world. We should also remember that it&#8217;s not that we must fall down &#8211; it&#8217;s always a matter of our own choice. Krishna didn&#8217;t manifest the jiva with the purpose in mind that he should fall down. Krishna wants to simply enjoy that jewel quality of voluntary surrender.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li>That question, &#8220;Why am I not perfect?&#8221; contains the seed of our material conditioning because it is the seed of Vaishnava aparadha.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>In the beginning, we were with Krishna. We knew He is our Lord. But what about our relationship to His shakti? &#8220;One who says he&#8217;s My devotee&#8230;&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Basic Krishna consciousness is Vasudeva realization, the Lord alone, without shakti (all shaktis internalized). This jnani-bhakta misras try to understand: bahunam-janmanam ante&#8230; They have a problem with shakti; vide Vallabhacarya (tendency to jump over). But they have the chance to develop a proper understand through inquisitive association, therefore of 4 kinds of materially-tinged devotees, they are the highest.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>c.Yogamaya is also curious about them. &#8220;Why are he so interested in the Lord but having difficulties with Me? Maybe he wants to be the Lord (iswara sayuja). Let&#8217;s test by offering a shakti for him to control and enjoy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>SP is only guru of ISKCON. But does he have shakti or not to create thousands of Bhaktivedantas, or<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>do\u00a0 we\u00a0 say,\u00a0 &#8220;No,\u00a0 only\u00a0 that\u00a0 Bhaktivedanta!&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>#Jiva tattva #Jivatattva &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; An Outline for a Discussion on the Subject of &#8220;How and from Where Does the Spirit Soul Fall Down to the Material\u00a0 World?&#8221; &nbsp; by\u00a0 Suhotra\u00a0 Swami &nbsp; &nbsp; [Note: &hellip; <a class=\"kt-excerpt-readmore\" href=\"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/an-outline-for-a-discussion-on-the-subject-of-how-and-from-where-does-the-spirit-soul-fall-down-to-the-material-world\/\" aria-label=\"An Outline for a Discussion on the Subject of &#8220;How and from Where Does the Spirit Soul Fall Down to the  Material\u00a0 World?&#8221;\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":81,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-english"],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-04-22 02:15:06","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/81"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.isvara.org\/archive\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}